GARDEN:
Gravity-Aligned
Reconstruction of
Disentangled
ENvironments from RGB Images
TL;DR GARDEN turns multi-view RGB into a gravity-aligned, simulation-ready scene.
Abstract
Converting multi-view RGB into simulation-ready 3D scenes is hard because reconstruction pipelines produce monolithic geometry—defined up to an arbitrary global rotation and entangling objects with the background—while CAD-retrieval fixes sacrifice scene-specific fidelity. We propose GARDEN, an RGB-only framework that reformulates reconstruction as physically-grounded scene factorization: using gravity as a universal prior, it aligns the scene to a Gravity-View frame, recovers object-centric rigid meshes with accurate 6-DoF poses, and removes duplicate object geometry from the background. The resulting structured hybrid representation is directly simulation-ready while preserving visual realism, improving placement reliability, disentanglement, and efficiency over retrieval-based baselines.
Method
GARDEN casts reconstruction as gravity-driven physically-grounded factorization. From multi-view RGB, it builds a unified Gravity-View (GV) frame to resolve orientation ambiguity, then splits the scene into independent rigid objects (explicit 6-DoF meshes) and a clean background (point cloud or 3DGS)—a structured hybrid representation ready for both physics simulation and photorealistic rendering.
The pipeline has four stages:
- Gravity-View alignment. A lightweight module reuses DepthAnything-3 camera tokens to regress the rotation into a gravity-aligned frame, resolving the global orientation ambiguity left by multi-view foundation models.
- Target-driven object factorization. From a single 2D box (user- or VLM-provided), SAM-3 and SAM-3D recover a complete amodal mesh, and FoundationPose refines its 6-DoF pose—reduced to translation and yaw thanks to the fixed vertical axis.
- Point-conditional background disentanglement. A Transformer-based point classifier removes the duplicated object geometry from the scene while preserving a high-fidelity background.
- Unified physics simulation. Object and floor meshes drive rigid-body dynamics while the cleaned background provides a photorealistic backdrop in a shared, gravity-consistent frame.
Results
Following the LiteReality protocol, we evaluate GARDEN on object-centric perceptual quality and holistic scene quality, and additionally assess gravity-estimation accuracy. Unless noted, GARDEN's rendering results are measured after a 10-second MuJoCo simulation, a conservative stress test that penalizes any gravity-inconsistent placement.
Cross-dataset comparison against SAM-3D and DepthAnything-3. Results are shown from post-simulation states.
RMSE and LPIPS: lower is better. SSIM: higher is better. The best result in each column is in bold.
Object-Centric Material Recovery
| Method | RMSE ↓ | SSIM ↑ | LPIPS ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIR | 0.2377 | 0.3981 | 0.6111 |
| PhotoShape | 0.3225 | 0.2371 | 0.6558 |
| MIR + AO | 0.2156 | 0.4203 | 0.5899 |
| Sem&Vis | 0.2835 | 0.3758 | 0.6362 |
| LiteReality | 0.2163 | 0.4353 | 0.5854 |
| Ours (3DGS, post-sim) | 0.1880 | 0.4181 | 0.5035 |
| Ours (point cloud, post-sim) | 0.1887 | 0.4240 | 0.4444 |
| Ours (3DGS, static) | 0.1796 | 0.4494 | 0.4182 |
| Ours (point cloud, static) | 0.1736 | 0.4656 | 0.3680 |
Holistic Graphics-Ready Scene
| Method | RMSE ↓ | SSIM ↑ | LPIPS ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phone2Proc | 0.3604 | 0.5512 | 0.7338 |
| ACDC | 0.3653 | 0.5531 | 0.7364 |
| ACDC + Sem&Vis | 0.3226 | 0.5425 | 0.6717 |
| ACDC + MIR | 0.3046 | 0.5492 | 0.6648 |
| LiteReality | 0.2664 | 0.5818 | 0.6522 |
| Ours (3DGS, post-sim) | 0.1670 | 0.5573 | 0.4709 |
| Ours (point cloud, post-sim) | 0.1616 | 0.5735 | 0.4081 |
| Ours (3DGS, static) | 0.1593 | 0.5718 | 0.4379 |
| Ours (point cloud, static) | 0.1511 | 0.5916 | 0.3770 |
Gravity Estimation Accuracy angular error in degrees, lower is better
| Method | Hypersim | TartanAir | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ↓ | P90 ↓ | Fail@10 ↓ | Mean ↓ | P90 ↓ | Fail@10 ↓ | |
| Plane-RANSAC | 24.87 | 89.68 | 26.7 | 19.26 | 83.22 | 34.4 |
| Normal clustering | 30.98 | 89.77 | 33.3 | 21.33 | 88.70 | 37.5 |
| COLMAP's Manhattan | 2.62 | 6.38 | 0.0 | 8.37 | 15.91 | 12.5 |
| GeoCalib | 7.59 | 4.79 | 6.7 | 3.01 | 6.50 | 9.4 |
| GeoCalib + RANSAC | 1.71 | 3.79 | 0.0 | 2.69 | 5.91 | 9.4 |
| Ours GV | 1.40 | 1.90 | 0.0 | 1.56 | 3.48 | 0.0 |
Citation
@inproceedings{sun2026garden,
title = {GARDEN: Gravity-Aligned Reconstruction of Disentangled ENvironments from RGB images},
author = {Sun, Jiahao and Wei, Dingkun and Shen, Zehong and Zhou, Hongyu and Shen, Yujun and Li, Liang},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year = {2026}
}